Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: artificial 24p -- "look of film" question

  1. #1
    Inactive Member ickle_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 29th, 2002
    Posts
    179
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    if you want less frames then do it before you film, video cameras shoot 60 frames a second and film is 24... read the intruction with your camera to see how its done. i.e change shutter speed?

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ February 12, 2003 07:17 AM: Message edited by: ickle_jim ]</font>

  2. #2
    Inactive Member emjen's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 9th, 2002
    Posts
    747
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    is that also possible with digital8 sony cameras?

  3. #3
    Inactive Member luckyinkentucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 24th, 2002
    Posts
    13
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Question

    I know the topic of making video have "that film look" is really annoying by now, and I apologize -- but I cant help myself. film looks so much better. I know I can take the footage I shot with my pd-150 and make the colors look like film in finalcut, but its still fast like video when i watch it on tv. I usually slow my footage down to make it look less like home video, but this isnt an option when theres dialogue in a scene. Heres what Im wondering: the video in the preview window on premiere or finalcut looks slightly slower, like 24p. at least a lot more so than the final exported product. Is this because the computer does some sort of drop-frame thing when previewing? and if so is there any way i can make my final exported video look like that?

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member miker's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 16th, 1999
    Posts
    2,620
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    make sure you use your video camera in 'progressive scan mode' or be prepared for a long render ...

  5. #5
    Inactive Member GREATwarEAGLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 29th, 2002
    Posts
    530
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Video is captured at 30 frames per second.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member jeromecain's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 5th, 2003
    Posts
    32
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    More specific is 29.97 per second of video. ha! Scan progessive as I seen it before and It still video look because I tasted film once and automatic understood film. Unless it scan progessive exact film then my two film camera would be on the shelf.dropped the frame to 24 which is good for blow up a film that can go the same speed which is more accurately. Jerome, deaf filmmaer and videomaker

    dcr-pd150's a real nice camcorder

  7. #7
    Inactive Member eidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 21st, 2003
    Posts
    362
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    hello

    Im tempted to say read the ******* manual but this is just envy so here is my 2 pence.
    Video cameras take 60 'images' a second. However it takes 2 of these 'images' to make one frame. Its complicated, but you neednt know all the details: One image are the odd scan lines in the frame, the next is the even scan lines in the frame.This is then all shown at 60- fps.
    The Sony PD150 has a feature which lets you take single images as frames. Fraid I cant recall what its called, but use this feature (as a help in finding it - when you use this feature you cant use a load of the other digital features.)
    This will help with getting the film look.
    After that I should chuck some movement on the images using a premier filter or something.

    Good luck.

  8. #8
    Inactive Member eidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 21st, 2003
    Posts
    362
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    yep thats it - progressive scan mode.

  9. #9
    Inactive Member emjen's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 9th, 2002
    Posts
    747
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Might be a bit off topic, but my friend saw a movie shot with three times as much fps than normal (more than a hundred(!)) and also watched it with a screen capable of showing more than what's usual, and even though the eye can't see more than 30 or something like that I believe, he said it looked really weird, natural like, as if it's real and slow motion at once. I don't know, but seems interesting, especially when you're doing slow motion with a camera shot like that.

    I thought I'd just say this.

  10. #10
    HB Forum Moderator Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2000
    Posts
    11,383
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I've seen a couple of digital video progressive scan 24 fps attempts, I didn't like the motion at all. Especially horizontal moves across the screen.

    Perhaps anyday now, perhaps it's here, I just haven't seen it yet on the cameras that you and I can afford.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •